US President Joe Biden and his team are traveling the country spouting the success of his economic policies. The package is called “Bidenomics.” It’s best understood as a contrast (which I’ll get to shortly) to traditional GOP economic policy recommendations. The latter argues for lower taxes, less government regulation, and minimizing social welfare spending. The fear underlying GOP dismissal of Bidenomics is that we will become a “socialist” nation. Think of Scandinavian nations with high taxes and high social spending. (The fact that these nations do not engage in socialism – a system where the government owns the means of production, distribution, and exchange – is beside the point. But discussing that would be a digression here.) The GOP policy prescription is based on core assumptions such as: The private sector can spend money more efficiently than the government. Low taxes on corporations…
Healthcare Needs a “Me Too” Movement
Some things should never happen in healthcare, like operating on the wrong place or providing the wrong medication or dosage. But such things happen, sadly. In a study of one insurer’s malpractice claims stemming from 68 wrong-site surgery claims between 2013-2020, 46% of patients required a second surgery, 10% experienced mobility dysfunction, and 9% had a worsened injury. Even worse, 15% died or totally lost function, about equally split. These mistakes should never have occurred. Since 2004, The Joint Commission (which accredits US healthcare organizations) has mandated a Universal Protocol for surgery. The protocol requires a pre-incision verification process, the surgeon marking the incision site on the body, and a surgical team time-out immediately before the incision so that any team member can stop the surgery. Yet between 2018 and 2022, The Joint Commission received 525 reports of wrong surgery. It’s a likely…
Effective policy demands flexibility that politicians lack
Our two political parties each champion a set of recommended economic policies. For the GOP, tax cuts are always helpful. For the Democrats, not so much—but government spending can solve a lot of problems. As an economist, the rigidity of political views – not just among the politicians but their distinct tribes of voters – dismays me. Why? Because different contexts demand different solutions. In early 2009, Captain Sullenberger went against traditional thinking when he safely landed an Airbus A320 on the Hudson Bay after it hit a flock of birds, cutting off all engine power. He didn’t follow standard procedures because he and co-pilot, Jeffrey Skiles, recognized the uniqueness of the situation. An economy is a far more complex system than a plane and its interaction with air. With any complex system, physics proves that starting conditions matter for what you do…
Five mistakes to avoid in your brand’s experiential marketing effort
With the pandemic easing in most of the US, brands are increasing their marketing budgets. It’s no wonder that some of that spending is focused on providing people with experiences (vs. advertisements). After all, we customers have been hunkered inside for more than a year. We’re approaching outdoor events as Rip Van Winkle reacted after being asleep for a long spell — eyes and hearts wide open to anything. As with all marketing efforts, there are ways to do experiences right and ways to do them wrong. For the latter, we need to look no further than the North Face X Gucci “Pit Stop” that was part of the 2021 Desert X event based in Palm Springs, California. Desert X presents art installations across 40 miles of the breathtaking Coachella Valley. This year, the event sought “to explore the idea of the desert…
Profits at what price?
Profits at what price? Pfizer had two choices when it discovered that each vial of its vaccine held six rather than five doses. One was to push the FDA to declare a vial contains six doses. With this decision, Pfizer would make more money. Because it gets paid for each dose, each vial could now be priced twenty-percent above the agreed-to purchase price. The premium would all drop to Pfizer’s bottom line. The alternative was to remember the original price met or beat Pfizer’s expected return rate, which would be huge given the quantity of vaccinations involved. Producing a vaccine for an unpredicted global pandemic is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for a pharma company. The extra dose could be a contribution, helping nations vaccinate more people than they had planned. Pfizer’s leadership team decided on the FDA route, choosing higher profits over societal benefits….